|
|
|
|
|
|
| Brad Birdwell and John Grendi of Third Law Sourcing, a solution provider at the marcus evans CFO Summit XXIX Fall 2014 and the CFO Summit XXX Spring 2015, on negotiating with current suppliers. |
NEW YORK, N.Y., Oct 27, 2014 - (ACN Newswire) - Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) should not wait until renewal time to renegotiate major contracts, according to Brad Birdwell, Managing Partner, and John Grendi, Senior Vice President, Third Law Sourcing. "Agreements with incumbent vendors can be addressed more frequently, improving pricing even in the middle of a multi-year term," says Birdwell.
Third Law Sourcing is a solution provider at the marcus evans CFO Summit XXIX Fall 2014 and the CFO Summit XXX Spring 2015.
- You say your consultancy identifies and implements pricing reductions on existing products and services with the current vendors. How does this differ from traditional sourcing practices?
Birdwell: Traditional sourcing can be resource and time intensive, and may impact existing relationships. When multiple vendors are competing, CFOs can achieve aggressive pricing, but such sourcing may not be an option with their existing partners. Their current supplier may be embedded within their team. There may be significant term or volume commitments within their current agreement. Or there may simply be few, if any, competitive alternatives in the marketplace. A meta-negotiation, where all parties agree that they are avoiding this path, can setup a principled negotiation that is non-disruptive to operations and significantly accelerates savings relative to traditional sourcing. The focus is on transparency into the best pricing model that could be negotiated as a new client today, and their current value to the supplier, based on current volumes and the current pricing environment.
How would a CFO know if they are not getting a good deal today?
Birdwell: As a former CFO, I used to frequently ask that question of my team: "Did we get a good deal?" I knew they all viewed themselves as stewards of the company's checkbook, so it was not surprising that the response was always "Yes". But the answer to my follow-up question of "How do we know?" was rarely as certain. There was often a lack of objective criteria with which to gauge the pricing and terms. And, over time, I became aware of certain red flags, things like bundled pricing, where multiple services were rolled into a single price, or volume commitments which might turn a good deal today into a not-so-good deal tomorrow. I would caution CFOs against waiting until renewal time to renegotiate. Many deals can - and should - be effectively renegotiated annually, even in the middle of a multi-year term.
- Aren't procurement organizations built to address this? Why leverage a third party?
Birdwell: Procurement teams leverage formal sourcing processes, executed by sourcing managers who understand the categories of spend most frequently procured by the company. However, a third party like our firm has specialized information and skills around the specific product, service, and vendor in question. It is rarely practical for a procurement team to employ an expert on the specific deal being negotiated. For example, many companies leverage an outsourced data center, but do not negotiate such deals frequently enough to allow an employee to keep their knowledge base current, or to justify the cost of such a specialized resource. By comparison, we negotiate with those vendors, for that service, on an ongoing basis on behalf of our clients. A mature sourcing organization is critical to ensuring pricing is within market. But the gap between "good" and "great" can be significant, as evidenced by the eight-figure savings we drive for our typical clients.
- A final question - why "Third Law Sourcing"?
Grendi: It is a reference to the three Laws of Motion. Newton's first law highlights the effort it requires to overcome inertia. Similarly, it can be difficult to overcome pricing inertia in the existing supplier environment. And Newton's third law describes the inherent balance between action and reaction. We focus on understanding the existing environment and the impact of each element of an incumbent negotiation. This principled approach allows us to balance vendor relationships and the bottom line - which we refer to as "Third Law" Sourcing.
For more information please send an email to info@marcusevanscy.com or visit the event websites below:
CFO Summit XXIX Fall 2014 - www.cfosummits.com
CFO Summit XXX Spring 2015 - www.cfosummits.com
Please note that the Summit is a closed business event and the number of participants strictly limited.
marcus evans group - finance/insurance sector portal - www.marcusevans.com/reviews/finance
The Finance Network - marcus evans Summits group delivers peer-to-peer information on strategic matters, professional trends and breakthrough innovations.
- LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/groups?mostPopular=&gid=3568428&trk=myg_ugrp_ovr
- You Tube: www.youtube.com/MarcusEvansFinance
- Twitter: www.twitter.com/meSummitFinance
- SlideShare: www.slideshare.net/MarcusEvansFinance
About Third Law Sourcing
Third Law Sourcing identifies and implements pricing reductions on its clients existing products and services, without traditional sourcing methods or changes to the existing vendor relationships. The company's engagements are risk-free and net cash flow positive; hard dollars savings are shared after the client validates that the benefit is truly incremental to its own internal efforts, and the savings have been implemented and realized. www.3rdlaw.com.
Contact:
Sarin Kouyoumdjian-Gurunlian
Press Manager, marcus evans, Summits Division
Tel: + 357 22 849 313
Email: press@marcusevanscy.com
Topic: Trade Show or Conference
Source: marcus evans Summits
Sectors: Daily Finance, Daily News
https://www.acnnewswire.com
From the Asia Corporate News Network
Copyright © 2024 ACN Newswire. All rights reserved. A division of Asia Corporate News Network.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
